Ted Turner on Nuclear Disarmament

In the above video excerpt, media mogul Ted Turner explains that his professional focus has changed from being a media entrepreneur to taking on the big issues, such as nuclear disarmament.

It was part of a wide-ranging (and often humorous) discussion he had with the San Francisco Chronicle's Phil Bronstein at The Commonwealth Club November 18, 2008.

Please forgive the low-quality video; we'll post a full video when our video partners at ForaTV make it available.

McGovern's Plan for Hunger Is Gaining Traction, Again

Since Barack Obama's victory, everyone on the left is adding their pet causes to the presidential wish list.

Get rid of Guantanamo. Vigorously strike down torture. Reduce global warming. Bring the troops home. Appoint Paris Hilton secretary of the interior (designing) – well, maybe not. But, one idea put forth by former presidential candidate George McGovern is noteworthy.

During a 2005 foreign policy speech at the Commonwealth Club of California (see photo above), McGovern laid out a plan to combat world hunger that is gaining some traction since the election of president-elect Obama. (Read a transcript of McGovern's speech here.)

McGovern, referring to the then-$5 billion monthly cost of the War in Iraq, believed a portion of that expenditure could be spent on feeding people worldwide.

We have about 300 million hungry kids going to school; they trudge off in the morning after a makeshift breakfast, if they are lucky, and sit for five or six hours with nothing to eat. How do you educate a youngster under those conditions? Out of those 300 million, 120 million have dropped out of school or never started, mostly girls, because of the favoritism towards us males in most societies. But when you start one of these school lunch programs, school enrollment jumps. Girls come as well as boys. Academic performance goes up, athletic performance goes up, general health improves. And a third thing happens: These little illiterate girls that stay at home in those mud huts, they start getting married as early as 10 years of age.

The meshing of hunger with education and women's rights is the most intriguing aspect of McGovern's plan. In an interesting Q&A in the current issue of Gourmet, he again returns to this idea with a finer point.

When you start a school-lunch program, both the boys and the girls come. And the parents discover that their kids can get a free meal every day, just by turning up at the village school. So they get both the boys and girls out of bed in the morning and shoo them off to school. It leaves more food for the people at home — mom, dad — and it pulls these girls into school, as well as the boys.

The idea is gaining some traction. In the Dec. 1, 2008 edition of The Nation, the editors call for the appointment of a "hunger czar" within Obama's first 100 days in office, urging him to cut hunger in half in 10 years.

Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind) introduced a bill Sept. 22 touches on many of McGovern's ideas of recognizing the connection between health and education, while hoping to stimulate U.S. farming communities and providing a better network for quick response on food distribution during emergencies. The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations with no action to this date.

The seeds of McGovern's battle against hunger first sprouted during the 1960 presidential election, when he urged John F. Kennedy to use growing crop surpluses to help feed people in other countries. Kennedy liked the plan for its moral qualities, but also for its appeal to Midwest farmers and their votes.

Though nourishment trumps nearly all basic human desires, the political reality is that funding is tight in the current economy and other projects may trump any hunger initiative.

This is a reason why some leaders such as Rep. Jo Ann Emerson (D-Mo.) believe this issue needs to be spotlighted by the new administration.

“That’s why we need to have a food czar in the West Wing,” said Emerson.

Jesse Jackson's Words Ring True 34 Years Later

The image of a teary-eyed Jesse Jackson was one of the most memorable moments of this past election night. It evoked the pain of the Civil Rights struggle and the new hope that Barack Obama represents to millions of people.

Rewind back to Aug. 1, 1974, and here is what a prescient Jackson, sounding Obama-esque, told a gathering at The Commonwealth Club in San Francisco:

Speaking before a group such as this group, marvel not that I say that fundamentally America needs to be born again. We come at a period approaching the bicentennial of this nation where we assess where we have come from, and we assess where we are going. And I argue that the most fundamental need in America today is to be reborn - the rebirth of a nation. Not to deal with just being 200 years old and starting all over again. We were once born of the water, and a baby in its mother's womb is in water. So all of us have already been born of the water. America's already been born as a nation 200 years ago, but there's a rebirth of the spirit of the nation that must take place again. There's nothing wrong with our money and our matter and our established institutions theoretically, except there's something terribly wrong with our attitude.

On election night, Jackson told ABC's Robin Roberts he had not slept much the past two night because, "it was almost like 1862, December 31, you knew the next day the Emancipation Proclamation would be signed and people couldn't sleep."

The final question of the Q&A portion of the program in 1974 asked Jackson whether there was a qualified black candidate for president in 1976. Little did Jackson know 34 years later his response would contain the seeds of what occurred Nov. 4.

I would hope that in a rebirth, that in a reassessing of people in this country, that we would no longer penalize people for being born of the female sex or being born of a particular ethnic group other than white Anglo-Saxon Protestant, but rather would deal in ideas, rather than race and sex.

Click here to listen to the speech and read the transcript here.

Did Latino Voters Really Turn Red States Blue?

Conventional wisdom says Latino voters greatly helped Barack Obama become president-elect, but do the numbers back up such an assertion?

Frederico Pena, the former secretary of energy under President Clinton and mayor of Denver, told the Associated Press earlier this week that battleground states such as Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Florida would not have been won by Obama if not for the Latino voting bloc.

Poll numbers show voters backed Obama over Sen. John McCain by a 2-to-1 margin. McCain's 31 percent was significantly lower than the 44 percent President Bush garnered in 2004.

But, Mark Krikorian, writing "The Corner" blog at National Review, has an alternative view of the Latino vote's tangible power in this year's election.

According to the usual suspects, the benchmark in garnering Hispanic votes for Republicans is Bush's 40 percent showing in 2004. So what would have happened if McCain had matched Bush's performance, instead of the 31 percent he actually got? Based on CNN's exit polls, McCain still would have lost Nevada, Colorado, Florida, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, not to mention, say, California and New Jersey. Conversely, even if Obama had won 90 percent of the Hispanic vote in Texas, instead of 63 percent, he still would have lost the state. With the possible exception of North Carolina, where the results were close but the number of Hispanic voters is too small to register in the exit poll, there doesn't seem to be a single state where the Hispanic vote was critical to the outcome.

If the Latino vote didn't sway a single state one way or the other, what gives? Why are Latino leaders patting themselves on the backs and Republicans stressing over the loss of a group perceived to be "conservative-ready"?

The importance of Latinos voting in greater numbers for Democrats, along with their demographic growing larger and tending to be younger, in general, could portend great discomfort for future conservatives trying to win not only presidential electoral politics, but governorships in the West and seats in Congress.

An article at U.S. News indicates Latinos' switch toward Obama may have been part of an overall disillusionment by all demographics from eight years of President Bush.

Economic factors are on the minds of most Americans but may have hit Latinos harder. According to the article, Latinos are twice as likely to receive high-interest loans than whites, putting them at risk for financial upheaval in this tumultuous financial climate.

Disproportionately higher unemployment for Latinos may have also changed perceptions, as did the relative absence of gay marriage (excluding California and two other states) and abortion as issues to stoke latent conservative values Latinos tend to possess.

Luis Ricardo Fraga, an associate provost at the University of Washington and former Stanford University professor, will share his insights on the role of Latino voters in the 2008 election and the history of Latino voting patterns from 1960 to present, in a speech to The Commonwealth Club on November 19 at Morris Dailey Auditorium on the campus of San Jose State University.

Ted Turner: Man of Mystery

Ted Turner once called audience members with crucifix-marked foreheads “Jesus freaks” one Ash Wednesday and believes global warming will ultimately cause humans to become cannibals.

Yet there is more to Turner than his propensity for raucous hyperbole and politically incorrect jest.

In his new book, Call Me Ted, according to reviews, Turner wants to tell you about the rise of CNN, his sporting adventures retaining the America's Cup and winning the World Series with the Atlanta Braves, the inner-workings of the infamous deal with Time Warner and ill-fated merger with AOL. But save for intimate details of his divorce from Jane Fonda, there is little new information about his life, and that seems to suit Turner well.

According to a New York Times article, writer Bill Burke wrote a flattering and lengthy magazine article entitled "Leadership Lessons I Learned From Ted Turner," which resulted in Turner immediately offering Burke the job of writing his memoirs. Burke has never written a book before.

What did Turner get by choosing Burke rather than an author with more gravitas for the autobiography (for which Grand Central Publishing paid an advance of $5 million)? Turner's agent Morton Janklow seems to indicate that, despite worries about Burke's inexperience, Turner's comfort with the author was a fair trade off for the lack of a big-name writer.

A review in the San Francisco Chronicle gets to the heart of Turner's entrepreneurial spirit, comparing him to other contemporary tech visionaries who stumbled once their dream was established.

Turner is a perfect visionary for a start-up; a leader who might make mistakes, but who will always be ready to work harder than the next guy and turn a crazy idea into a successful organization. But once the idea is realized, the charismatic visionary can be out of place.

The hard-charging Turner can be seen here in a 60 Minutes segment on the 1977 America's Cup.

In a dispute over the purchase of sails, Turner tells Walter Cronkite if his competitor is winning by the end of the race, "We'll sink them," before adding, "That would be unsportsmanlike conduct, I'm sure."

The irascible Turner continues to be the philanthrophic man of mystery thoroughly romanticized in American culture. A sort of gap-toothed, free-wheeling Bruce Wayne of cable news who still thinks you should try some bison meat.

Turner will appear at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco Wednesday, November 19 at noon and in San Jose.

What's "The New Paternalism"?

The Commonwealth Club's media and public relations team sends word with additional information on the November 14 speech by David Whitman: Secondary Schools that Succeed:

Veteran journalist David Whitman will share his ideas on how a new generation of inner-city schools is closing the achievement gap between white and minority students. The common, yet rarely discussed ingredient these new schools share, says Whitman, is the practice of "new paternalism," a benevolent form of interaction where schools become “warm, caring places and teachers and principals form paternal-like bonds with students.” Whitman will discuss this historic achievement and how other schools can replicate this model.

Whitman covered social policy for U.S. News & World Report for close to two decades from 1985-2003. Prior to 1999 he served as the newsweekly’s chief correspondent covering social policy for 14 years. Whitman’s articles have appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, the Atlantic, The New Republic, and numerous other publications. Whitman has also taught at the School of Media and Public Affairs at The George Washington University in Washington D.C. He received a bachelor’s degree from Amherst College in 1978.

Part of the Koret Foundation's Principles of a Free Society series.

To purchase tickets to the event, visit The Club's web site.

Members of the press interested in an interview, attending the event, or other information, please contact Riki Rafner, The Commonwealth Club's director of media and public relations.

Experts: After Spill, Local Bureaucracy is Still Lagging Behind Clean Up

Though the ill-fated cargo ship Cosco Busan trudged through the San Francisco Bay one dense, foggy morning a year ago today, the consequences of the oil spill still reverberate not only ecologically, but at all levels of government.

Despite a bevy of bills signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and a far greater amount of awareness about the issue, critics complain that the region is still not sufficiently prepared to deal with another large-scale spill.

California Assemblyman Jared Huffman along with an environmental activist and local emergency manager, speaking today at the Commonwealth Club found that problems still exist in the areas of response.

Huffman, who represents Marin County, which suffered oil damage to the coastline at Bolinas Lagoon, wonders whether private contractors are the best choice for clean up. “Is it a good idea to rely on folks who wold make more money if the spill is allowed to worsen?” said Huffman.

He also questions whether the proximity of such responders, nearly all unfamiliar with the terrain and surf of the Bay Area are best equipped to handle situations.

Some out-of-state responders needed to be rescued from the ocean by volunteer fire fighters, he said.

“They have adopted at the Federal level this system of private contractors." said Huffman. "I think we ought to be questioning the effectiveness and the efficacy of relying on contractors who may be very good at what they do but are not located nearby when you need them."

Also problematic to the panel is the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 that, in effect, gives ship owners the first right to cleaning any spill.

"It is the culture of the oil spill response community to make best use of primary resources -- contractors that specialize in oil spill response. They have elaborate mechanisms and pieces of equipment as well as highly trained personnel that specialize in how to get heavy black stuff off the water into the boat," said Chris Godley, manager of emergency response in Marin. "That said, though, there are other resources that may be useful for such a response that are available from local and even state governments that were initially declined.”

These include the use of aviation, communication systems and local volunteers.

Godley noted the throng of volunteers itching to help clean Bay Area beaches was unprecedented in the United States. Most places where oil spills occur are in areas away from large metropolitan area as opposed to the leak in the greater Bay Area.

“Someone literally poured oil on your doormat, you’re going to want to go out and take care of it,” said Godley.

Sejal Choksi, the director of programs at Baykeeper, a local group striving to preserve the bay waters, believes the key to preventing a large scale disaster is too work quickly after the initial accident.

(For more, read Choksi's article in the opinion section of the San Francisco Chronicle.)

One problem facing the bay's unique geography is that technology does not yet exist to clean up some local coastlines. According to Choksi, the current in Bolinas Lagoon is too swift to operate safely; Angel Island is too rocky; and both Richardson Bay and the mudflats near Emeryville are too shallow to protect.

In the big picture, though, the speakers said that everyday pollution is a more manageable and growing problem than shipping containers floating in and out the bay.

"Oil spills are not the biggest threat to the bay," said Choksi. "They are a tremendous threat to the bay, but our everyday activities do pose more pollution problems for the bay’s health and water quality.”

Though he said that local officials were not ready to respond to the oil spill in the bay a year ago, Godley thinks some of the measures taken since then would have lessened the damage to the ecosystem. “Things may have been different had the provision now in place as a result of the Cosco Busan been in place at the time of the event.”

Six Cosco Busan Crewmembers Still Held One Year Later

Tomorrow marks the one year-anniversary of the Cosco Busan oil spill, which released 53,000 gallons of heavy bunker fuel into San Francisco Bay. (Click here for a slideshow of the accident)

An Associated Press article this morning details that six Chinese sailors are still being held as material witnesses. Two of the six have admitted to forging documents after the 900-foot cargo ship slammed into one of the Bay Bridge's support columns.

Do not worry, this isn't Guantanamo West; the six Chinese nationals are detained but free to travel about the city. The AP article adds:

Living rent-free in apartments and hotels, they are permitted to roam San Francisco and the surrounding area. They continue to draw their salaries, and each also receives $1,200 per month in witness fees, more than the monthly salary of at least one detained seaman.

Also, San Francisco Chronicle environmental reporter Jane Kay provides an interesting piece in today's paper illustrating the damage done to the bay's ecosystem and how it has improved.

On Nov. 7, The Commonwealth Club will host, "One Year After the Oil Spill: What Has Changed?" featuring California State Assemblyman Jared Huffman, Baykeeper and Program Director Sejal Choksi, Manager of Emergency Services, Marin County Sheriff Office of Emergency Services Chris Godley and moderated by David Lewis, Executive Director, Save the Bay.

Ifill in the Running for Meet the Press Post

Gwen Ifill, the host of PBS' "Washington Week" and senior correspondent for the "NewsHour with Jim Lehrer" may have a new job.

The New York Times reported Ifill, who is scheduled to speak at the Commonwealth Club Jan. 28, has been contacted by NBC News regarding replacing the late Tim Russert as permanent host of "Meet the Press."

The article points out NBC News has gained criticism over a lack of promoting minorities in high profile positions at the network.

The website dontletNBCdiswomen.org is protesting the network's lack of women and minorities, noting all five Sunday morning public affairs programs are hosted by white males.

While the group does not advocate any one journalist, it does offer CNN's Campbell Brown, NBC's Andrea Mitchell and the aforementioned Ifill.

Speculation on Russert's replacement has raged for months, with names such as the bombastic Chris Matthews, NBC political analyst Chuck Todd and former White House correspondent David Gregory topping the list.

Ifill's name, though, has been bandied about for months.

On his blog at Atlantic.com, Matthew Yglesias, speculated in June that Ifill would be a great choice for the Sunday spot if NBC chose to hire someone outside the network.

Controversy followed Ifill during the lone vice presidential debate held Oct. 2 when conservatives claimed her forthcoming book called, The Breakthrough: The Politics and Race in the Age of Obama would cloud her objectivity.

Michael Crichton, 1942-2008

Author Michael Crichton passed away on Tuesday, dying of cancer at the age of 66.

Best known for his science fiction novels such as Jurassic Park, The Andromeda Strain, and Congo, Crichton was also a film and television creator/writer/director, having given the world the blockbuster medical drama "ER" and having written and directed 1973's Westworld. And if his writing wasn't necessarily great art, Crichton's writing in the worlds of science fact and science fiction were immensely popular, with his books selling a mind-boggling 150 million copies around the world.

Crichton's biggest professional success might have been that he was not categorized as a science fiction writer, despite the fact that he wrote about robotic societies, dinosaurs brought back to life, and communication with intelligent gorillas. A traditional definition of science fiction is a story extrapolating the effects of some scientific advance. (There's a never-ending dispute, of course, between purists who stick to that definition and others who want to include under the science fiction banner everything from a space fantasy such as Star Wars to magical fantasies such as Harry Potter. We'll spare you that discussion.)

Crichton, despite escaping the definition of a science fiction writer, stuck pretty close to the traditional definition of SF, producing stories exploring how people reacted individually and en masse to scientific developments. He certainly wasn't correct all the time in his predictions, but his career suggested a serious attempt to meet head-on the challenges that come about from our scientific progress (and occasional scientific transgressions).

In a famous speech delivered to The Commonwealth Club on September 15, 2003, Crichton attacked climate-change theorists as adherents of a new religion. (Read the entire speech.) Delivered as a defense of sound science and a critique of emotion-fueled pseudo-science, his speech has long been a milestone in the debate between people worried about the effects of man-made climate change and people who questioned the assumptions behind the other group's claims.

Crichton is survived by his wife and other family members.